Snapshot of the most deprived UK areas based on the deprivation index. Higher values indicate higher deprivation, shown at neighbourhood (small-area) level.
Last data update: 03 February 2026
| Place | Area | District | Deprivation index |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Promenade & Seasiders Way | Blackpool | 7 |
| 2 | Central Blackpool | Blackpool | 20 |
| 3 | Ely East | Cardiff | 28 |
| 4 | Grimsby East Marsh & Port | North East Lincolnshire | 71 |
| 5 | Townhill | Swansea | 79 |
| 6 | Pillgwenlly & Docks | Newport | 110 |
| 7 | St Mellons West | Cardiff | 117 |
| 8 | Penderry | Swansea | 129 |
| 9 | Central Stockton & Portrack | Stockton-on-Tees | 130 |
| 10 | Ringland | Newport | 131 |
| 11 | Birkenhead Central | Wirral | 137 |
| 12 | South Riverside | Cardiff | 149 |
| 13 | Splott | Cardiff | 166 |
| 14 | Page Moss & Fincham | Knowsley | 166 |
| 15 | Trowbridge | Cardiff | 171 |
| 16 | Caia Park | Wrexham | 173 |
| 17 | Everton East | Liverpool | 195 |
| 18 | North East Centre | Blackpool | 195 |
| 19 | Gurnos, Trefechan & Pontsticill | Merthyr Tydfil | 200 |
| 20 | Anfield West | Liverpool | 214 |
| 21 | Adamsdown | Cardiff | 216 |
| 22 | Rhyl South West | Denbighshire | 218 |
| 23 | Bettws | Newport | 220 |
| 24 | Caerau East | Cardiff | 221 |
| 25 | Llanelli South | Carmarthenshire | 224 |
| 26 | Tylorstown | Rhondda Cynon Taf | 233 |
| 27 | Rhyl North | Denbighshire | 235 |
| 28 | Caerau | Bridgend | 246 |
| 29 | Boulevard & St Andrew’s Quay | Kingston upon Hull, City of | 256 |
| 30 | Aberafan | Neath Port Talbot | 259 |
| 31 | Caerau West | Cardiff | 261 |
| 32 | Rhymney, Pontlottyn & Abertysswg | Caerphilly | 262 |
| 33 | Landore | Swansea | 273 |
| 34 | Sandfields | Neath Port Talbot | 276 |
| 35 | Penrhiw-ceibr | Rhondda Cynon Taf | 276 |
| 36 | Longview & Knowsley Park | Knowsley | 290 |
| 37 | Treherbert | Rhondda Cynon Taf | 292 |
| 38 | Gelli-deg & Town | Merthyr Tydfil | 293 |
| 39 | Neath Town | Neath Port Talbot | 299 |
| 40 | Trefethin & Pen-y-garn | Torfaen | 303 |
| 41 | Harpurhey South & Monsall | Manchester | 306 |
| 42 | North Ormesby & Brambles | Middlesbrough | 309 |
| 43 | Stow Hill | Newport | 311 |
| 44 | Aberbargoed & Gilfach | Caerphilly | 313 |
| 45 | West Pontnewydd & Thornhill | Torfaen | 313 |
| 46 | Briton Ferry | Neath Port Talbot | 315 |
| 47 | Tremorfa & Pengam | Cardiff | 321 |
| 48 | Grangetown North | Cardiff | 330 |
| 49 | Abertillery South & Llanhilleth | Blaenau Gwent | 331 |
| 50 | Little Layton & Little Carleton | Blackpool | 340 |
This ranking makes one thing uncomfortably clear: deprivation in the UK is not an accident, and it is not evenly shared. It is entrenched, persistent, and overwhelmingly concentrated in places that have been economically neglected for decades.
The very bottom of the list is dominated by parts of Blackpool and Cardiff, areas that have become shorthand for long-term failure to regenerate coastal towns and inner-city communities. These neighbourhoods are not just struggling relative to national averages — they are structurally disconnected from growth, opportunity, and investment.
As the list expands, the same names keep reappearing. Blackpool shows up repeatedly, Cardiff clusters tightly around its most deprived wards, and large parts of South Wales form a continuous belt of deprivation. This repetition matters: it signals systemic problems at city and district level, not isolated pockets of hardship.
Elsewhere, the pattern repeats almost predictably. Newport, Swansea, Liverpool, and the Welsh Valleys feature heavily — places shaped by industrial decline, weak local labour markets, and limited inward investment. These areas have been the subject of countless regeneration strategies, yet continue to appear at the sharp end of deprivation rankings.
Taken together, the data leaves little room for comforting narratives. Deprivation in England and Wales remains tightly bound to post-industrial decline, fragile coastal economies, and dense urban cores, and progress in these areas has been slow at best. Without sustained, place-specific intervention, these neighbourhoods are likely to remain stuck at the bottom — not because of short-term shocks, but because of long-term policy choices.